Anytime argumentative and abductive reasoning

نویسنده

  • Rolf Haenni
چکیده

This article presents a new approximation method for computing arguments or explanations in the context of logic-based argumentative or abductive reasoning. The algorithm can be interrupted at any time returning the solution found so far. The quality of the approximation increases monotonically when more computational resources are available. The method is based on cost functions and returns lower and upper bounds.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Query-Driven Anytime Algorithm for Argumentative and Abductive Reasoning

This paper presents a new approximation method for computing arguments or explanations in the context of logic-based argumentative or abductive reasoning. The algorithm can be interrupted at any time returning the solution found so far. The quality of the approximation increases monotonically when more computational resources are available. The method is based on cost functions and returns lowe...

متن کامل

Ampliative Patterns in Argumentative Reasoning

There are good characterizations of ampliative inference in monotonic theories. However, a problem that faces ampliative inference, in particular abduction, is the explanation of anomalous observations, i. e., observations that are contradictory with the current theory. For this reason, in this work we will consider the problem of embedding abduction of surprising and anomalous observations in ...

متن کامل

Argumentative Reasoning with ABEL

Most formal approaches to argumentative reasoning under uncertainty focus on the analysis of qualitative aspects. An exception is the framework of probabilistic argumentation systems. Its philosophy is to include both qualitative and quantitative aspects through a simple way of combining logic and probability theory. Probabilities are used to weigh arguments for and against particular hypothese...

متن کامل

Detecting Conflict-Free Argumentative or Abductive Knowledge Bases

This paper presents a simple method that reduces the problem of detecting conflict-free assumption-based knowledge bases to the problem of testing satisfiability.

متن کامل

Bayesian Reasoning in an Abductive Mechanism for Argument Generation and Analysis

Our argumentation system, NAG, uses Bayesian networks in a user model and in a normative model to assemble and assess arguments which balance persuasiveness with normative correctness. Attentional focus is simulated in both models to select relevant subnetworks for Bayesian propagation. The subnetworks are expanded in an iterative abductive process until argumentative goals are achieved in both...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Soft Comput.

دوره 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003